Director Sam Gold’s ‘Romeo + Juliet’ Is Technically Shakespeare, but the Bard’s Words Are Often Overshadowed in This Garish Production

While I have no problem with alterations such as suggesting Benvolio secretly pines for Romeo, I don’t find it especially daring in 2024. I found myself asking, as I did often while watching this production, what does this add to the story?

Matthew Murphy and Evan Zimmerman
Rachel Zegler and Kit Connor in 'Romeo + Juliet.' Matthew Murphy and Evan Zimmerman

The director Sam Gold is known for shaking things up in his productions of canonical plays, particularly when it comes to Shakespeare. His “King Lear” of several years back starred a woman (the late, great Glenda Jackson) in the title role; for “Macbeth,” he preceded the action with a short lecture providing historical background, delivered by an actor in a wheelchair.

Truly, though, nothing prepared me for Mr. Gold’s “Romeo + Juliet,” which opened on Broadway this week. Another auteur not known for subtlety, Baz Luhrmann, used the same title nearly three decades ago for his modernized screen adaptation of this seminal tale of star-crossed love; Mr. Gold seems determined to bring it kicking and screaming — literally, at points — into the 21st century.

Enter your email to read this article.

Get 2 free articles when you subscribe.

or
Have an account? This is also a sign-in form.
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Advertisement
The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use