Obama’s Pandering to Moral Equivalence Between Israel and Hamas Illuminates His Shortcomings as an American Strategist

It doomed his own attempts to effect any improvement in Arab-Jewish relations or American-Muslim relations.

AP/ Haraz N. Ghanbari, file
President Obama on March 23, 2012 at the White House Rose Garden. AP/ Haraz N. Ghanbari, file

President Obama’s pandering to sentiments of moral equivalence between Hamas terrorists, violating a truce and murdering Israeli children and women in the most brutal possible manner, and Israeli soldiers conducting operations designed to destroy Hamas, is the most startling development we have yet had of the former president’s shortcomings as an American geopolitical strategist.

It has been a fact of American history since its earliest days as an independent country that recourse to armed combat, if it entailed any significant number of American casualties, had to be justifiable both in terms of the country’s national interest and its national ethos as a peace-loving country that never took up arms for morally unjustifiable purposes.

Enter your email to read this article.

Get 2 free articles when you subscribe.

or
Have an account? This is also a sign-in form.
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Advertisement
The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use