If It Sounds Like an Election Year Handout, That’s Because It Is

If this whole student bailout business costs $300 billion over 10 years, as some are estimating, then that wipes out the Schumer-Manchin deficit reduction. I never bought into their deficit reduction anyway.

AP/Evan Vucci
President Biden speaks about student loan debt forgiveness at the White House, August 24, 2022. AP/Evan Vucci

The talk of the town is President Biden’s decision to cancel student loans for a large number of people who are mostly concentrated in the upper reaches of our national income. I’m being a bit vague here because I’m seeing a lot of numbers bandied about, but so far no official scorecard price-out from the CBO. Essentially, it sounds like a married couple earning $250,000 a year would be eligible for a bailout of roughly $20,000.

There are provisions for people working in nonprofits, there are Pell Grant loans involved, and enormous complexity from the White House fact sheet and other sources. My take is, this is a bad idea. 

Mr. Biden is using questionable Covid health emergency authority — a very shaky assumption — to hand out this election year relief. More or less 70 percent of predominantly middle-class taxpayers are going to be bailing out something like 30 percent of those most well off. Oh, and that’s right, it does sound like an election year handout, doesn’t it?

Think of this: With the Schumer-Manchin bill and its business tax hikes and IRS assault squad, the government is coming after typical families and working people. That’s the way this shakes out. 

Also there’s no debt reduction because in four years the student debt volume will be back to $1.6 trillion. Is this inflationary? Well, yes, at least indirectly. If the interest and principal on your student loan is canceled, then you’ll have more money to spend elsewhere. 

It bids up demand while Mr. Biden’s enhanced tax and regulatory strangle holds down supply. I oversimplify here, but that’s one way to look at it. 

If this whole student bailout business costs $300 billion over 10 years, as some are estimating, then that wipes out the Schumer-Manchin deficit reduction. I never bought into their deficit reduction anyway. 

Another thought: The education department does not remotely have the expertise to handle a $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio. It’s a regulatory and policy agency, not a bank. Shades of the EPA running a $27 billion national “climate bank.” Same nonsense.

It was President Obama who ended private lending by banks and others for student loans and moved the whole sorry story into the federal government, into the education department.

We in the Trump administration wanted to pull out, including the education secretary, Betsy DeVos. Get it out of there, because those educrats don’t know anything about banking and nowadays spend most of their time on critical race theory.  

Plus, why not move student lending back to the private lending sector? They know how to judge credit and evaluate future earnings streams. Maybe not perfectly, but a lot better than the educrats.  

Team Biden doesn’t like the private sector, though, does it? That’s why they spend their time trying desperately to overturn President Trump’s pro-growth, tax, regulatory, and energy policies. Instead, the Bidens love federal central planning, jamming their faux, progressive policies down our throats, aka “big-government socialism.”

One last economic thought: Unfortunately, more bad news from purchasing managers and slumping business investment spending. Also, the Bidens have just published their mid-year budget and economic review that marks down growth and increases inflation. Here’s the tragedy: For the next 10 years the Biden economy, by their own estimates, is projected to grow by barely 2 percent a year.  

You know, if all this big-government socialism was such a great economic tonic, then why doesn’t it produce the goods? Literally. It’s like buying an expensive car that’s always in the repair shop. Who needs it?  

Long-term growth in America used to run around 3.5 percent yearly. That’s when free-enterprise capitalism was still in the driver’s seat. I mean, what good are socialists who can’t produce? How about growth incentives, rather than bailouts?  

How about “leave us alone” to produce and invest instead of strangling our hopes and dreams? How about a free capitalist economy to get us back toward full-throttle 4 percent prosperity? Save America. Repeal socialism. The cavalry’s coming. 

From Mr. Kudlow’s broadcast on Fox Business News.


The New York Sun

© 2024 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use