Voting for Harris To Save Democracy? More Like Idiocracy
The vice president is in no position to lecture anyone about any governing norms.
Vote. Donāt vote. I donāt care. Just stop telling me that Vice President Harris is going to save democracy.
Do I wish Republicans had nominated a more coherent, principled, competent candidate for the presidency? Of course. Only if anyone is under the impression Democrats tapped such a person, I have news. Spend some time trying to decipher Ms. Harrisā swirling, platitude-ridden, incoherent rhetoric and you will only be further convinced that we live in an idiocracy.
Sure, there are many reasons why a movement conservative might feel uncomfortable voting for President Trump. I get it. Iām not a fan. Yet there are plenty of completely rational reasons to vote for him, as well. First and foremost, the existence of the contemporary Democratic Party.
Liz Cheney, and other Never Trumpers, tell me that the former president poses a uniquely dangerous threat to the Constitution, and thus, I must set aside any policy disagreements with Democrats and put country over politics.
No doubt, this kind of self-glorification feels great, but it doesnāt really comport with reality.
For one thing, most of the leftās scariest warnings about Trump are fiction. I donāt believe the Atlantic when it tells me that Trump is a would-be Hitler. Iām sorry, I donāt believe heās going to throw all his political enemies in concentration camps. Save the story for the next Mueller investigation.
Considering recent history, in fact, itās clear to me that the left is far more adept and willing to weaponize the state to punish their enemies. And Iām not just talking about the unprecedented lawfare launched at Trump. Iām talking about debarring lawyers.
Iām talking about raiding the homes of pro-life activists. Iām talking about the spying on Catholic churches and the Justice Departmentās chilling speech by smearing parents who stood up to authoritarian school boards as terrorists.
Moreover, even if Trump acted on his worst instincts, the damage would likely be confined to his own presidency. Trump is about Trump. Ms. Harris and Democrats, though, have openly embraced a string of consequential, long-term attacks on the constitutional order. Ones that we can never come back from.
Sorry, I donāt accept that a woman who once complained to CNNās Jake Tapper that āmillions and millions of peopleā were speaking āwithout any level of oversight or regulation, and that has to stopā is going to be my champion of the Constitution.
Ms. Harrisā running mate, Governor Walz, recently argued that there is āno guaranteeā for free speech when it came to āmisinformationā or āhate speech,ā āespecially around our democracy.ā If this were a properly functioning republic, Mr. Walz would be thrown to the curb.
No honest person could possibly believe Democrats are better for free expression.
Letās not forget either that Ms. Harris once promised to bypass Congress and sign an executive order seizing rifles from millions of law-abiding Americans. Though Democrats like to pretend otherwise, the Second Amendment is still part of the Constitution.
Indeed, Ms. Harris is in no position to lecture anyone about any governing norms. She frequently praises Mr. Biden for ignoring courts and āforgivingā student loans by forcing taxpayers to foot the bill. She supports trashing the legislative filibuster, empowering slim majorities to destroy any semblance of federalism.
Ms. Harris has backed bills that would have overturned thousands of state laws, allowing national Democrats to strip state election security measures, make abortion legal until crowning, compel local religious hospitals to perform gender transition surgeries, shut down religious foster care organizations, and many other outrages.
None of this is to even speak of her efforts to destroy the Supreme Court. Ms. Harris, who gleefully took part in the vile smearing of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, supports packing the court ā the most serious attack on the judicial branch since President Franklin Rooseveltās effort in the 1930s.
Senate Democrats say it is āvirtually certainā they will pass a āSupreme Court reformā bill that, among other assaults on the judicial branch, will empower legislators to strip individual justices of their power.
This is all just blatantly authoritarian stuff.
Right now ā in part, because of Trump ā the court is the only institution in America that properly functions. There is no telling what kind of arsonist Ms. Harris and Democrats would install.
At the very least, I know Trump has a track record of not only nominating decent jurists but sticking with them under incredible pressure.
It is odd, indeed, that Democrats, who support price controls, state mandates, and a slew of other economic intrusions that force corporations to bend to their will, are constantly warning us about the specter of āfascism.ā
We have no clue if the Trump presidency plays out. Trumpism is whatever Trump says it is whenever he feels like it. It might well be a disaster. Still, Ms. Harris offers me nothing.
Creators.com