WASHINGTON – A hormone patch that works to restore a woman’s sex drive should not win government approval until more studies are completed to determine the drug’s risks, federal health advisers recommended yesterday.

Several members of the Food and Drug Administration’s Advisory Committee said they were not satisfied with the number of women studied so far, the length of the studies and the modest benefits of the drug.

Procter & Gamble sought to market the testosterone patch Intrinsa to women who lose their libido after their ovaries are removed. The company told the committee that significant safety concerns had not come up in clinical trials and that there was no reason to delay approval of the first drug for female sexual dysfunction.

But the committee unanimously sided on the need for more safety data.

The company said in a statement it would work closely with the agency “to agree on a practical approach to provide additional safety data.”

The FDA is not bound by the committee’s recommendation, although the agency usually follows the guidance. An agency decision on Intrinsa is expected in a few weeks.

Clinical trials showed that women using Intrinsa had modest improvements to their sex lives. Women who applied the patch to their abdomen twice weekly had one more “satisfying sexual event” per four weeks than did women given a placebo, according to the data presented to the advisory panel.

Fifteen of every 100 women who used Intrinsa experienced a beneficial effect due to testosterone, said Dan Shemas, director of the FDA’s Division of Reproductive and Urologic Drugs.

By a 13-4 vote, federal advisers said that benefit was not “clinically meaningful.” Agency officials also noted a lack of controlled safety data for women who had used Intrinsa for more than six months.

The panel heard testimony that three of four women who developed breast cancer during the clinical trials were using Intrinsa.

Lisa Soule, a medical officer in the FDA’s Division of Reproductive and Urological Drugs, said those cases pointed to the limitations of short-term clinical trials.

Ms. Soule dismissed as inadequate Procter & Gamble’s post-marketing study comparing 5,500 women expected to use Intrinsa in the first year against matching women from a database of 10 million patients for rates of cancer and cardiovascular disease.

A federally funded research project, by contrast, had to enroll nearly 17,000 post-menopausal women to begin to detect the safety problems with hormonal therapy, Ms. Soule said.

The Women’s Health Initiative, a program established by the National Institutes of Health, found that postmenopausal women taking the hormones estrogen and progestin had higher risks of heart attack, stroke and breast cancer.

There is debate about how much hormonal therapy is to blame for some ailments. But there is general agreement that this treatment increases the risk of development of clots in blood vessels, said Dr. Charles Lockwood.

“There is just no doubt. And no debate. And no discussion about that,” said Dr. Lockwood, an expert in maternal fetal medicine at the Yale University School of Medicine and a member of the panel.” So, I think if there is one single element of safety that deserves the most scrutiny, it is the potential role of this patch” in promoting blood clots.