Harris’s Economic Plan: There’s Virtually No There, There
She can prattle on about a startup deduction, but really what one hand giveth, the other hand taketh away and then some.
Vice President Harris flubbed the most important question of the campaign. Big hat tip to Byron York, the veteran ace columnist of the Washington Examiner.
Mr. York was referring to the economy, which is the most important issue in the campaign, and was the first question of the debate and went to Ms. Harris: “when it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?”
Mr. York’s key point about Ms. Harris’s answer was that there was virtually no there, there.
Her most heralded proposal is a $50,000 small business startup deduction. Under current tax law, though, which is still President Trump’s tax cut law, new business owners can already deduct most early stage expenses like payroll and equipment costs.
Startup expenses really are minimal. And so many small business startups will never spend $50,000. In other words, it’s a poorly thought out plan.
And she never mentioned her proposal to repeal virtually all of the highly successful Trump tax cuts, including the 100 percent immediate expensing bonus for the purchase of new machinery and equipment.
That bonus depreciation is one of the most powerful, pro-growth policies for large, small, and new businesses. And it looks like Ms. Harris would repeal it.
Plus, her so-called economic plan raises the top income tax rate to 39.6 percent, which is what most successful new and small business owners pay.
Plus, her plan would repeal the 20 percent small business cost deduction embodied in the Trump plan. Plus, she would raise the capital gains tax, which rewards successful small business owners. And on top of that raises the estate tax which is another reward for successful small business owners.
So she can prattle on about a startup deduction, but really what one hand giveth, the other hand taketh away and then some.
You wanna hear a major league tax cut plan? Here’s what Trump said at the Economic Club of New York last Thursday: “The fifth pillar of my plan is to make the Trump tax cuts permanent. My plan calls for expanded R&D tax credits, 100 percent bonus depreciation expensing for new money factory investments, and a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 15 percent — solely for companies that make their product in America.”
That plan led to an increase in cumulative real income pre-pandemic for typical working families of $6,400 during the Trump years. Almost five times as much as the Biden-Harris gain of only $1,350.
The rest of Ms. Harris’s so-called economic plan is throwing out $25,000 of free money to buy homes — which would of course boost the price of new homes, which are already out of reach for young Americans.
Then she touts a $6,000 refundable child tax credit, which amounts to a guaranteed basic income for those who do not work.
That’s her so-called opportunity economy.
Mr. York calls it “the government giving people tax-payer money so they can pay higher prices.”
He notes that many economists believe these type proposals are too big, too broad, and not the best use of the money to help those most in need, according to a Wall Street Journal news story.
By the way, Trump did double the child tax credit to $2,000 from $1,000, but also slashed marginal tax rates for all individuals and of course for all businesses.
And then Ms. Harris also wants to again increase the earned income tax credit, also fully refundable and the most fraud ridden program in the American government, with an estimated $22 billion in fraudulent or erroneous payments.
And then remember in her economic speech in North Carolina, she proposed price controls on food and groceries, and who knows what else, an idea ridiculed by economists on both sides of the aisle.
Plus, her economic package was variously estimated at $2 trillion, of course that’s on top of the $2 trillion Biden-Harris budget deficit that runs as far as the eye can see.
She has never proposed a single reduction in federal spending. And has never had an answer for record deficit spending, all of which would contribute to higher, not lower long-run inflation.
So with all that, Mr. York concludes that Ms. Harris never answered the question: “when it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off now than they were four years ago?”
And for millions of people, undoubtedly the answer is no.
From Mr. Kudlow’s broadcast on Fox Business Network.