Democrats’ Character Assassination of Trump Has Real-World Consequences

If democracy’s in danger, what conclusion does a desperate man of action draw?

AP/Efrem Lukatsky
Ryan Wesley Routh at a rally at central Kyiv, Ukraine, April 30, 2022. AP/Efrem Lukatsky

If Democrats didn’t believe they’d put President Trump in an assassin’s crosshairs the first time, they have no excuse for pleading innocent now.

The suspect who hid in the bushes at Trump’s West Palm Beach golf club, Ryan Routh, waiting for his shot at the former president — AK-47-style rifle at the ready, serial number filed off — wasn’t some 20-year-old without a political paper trail, like the first would-be assassin, Thomas Crooks.

Routh, 58 and now in custody, “frequently posted about politics” on X and other social media, had a Biden-Harris sticker on his truck, “and exclusively donated to Democratic candidates and causes dating back to 2019,” the New York Post reports.

He even featured in a New York Times story last year highlighting his efforts to recruit Afghan soldiers to fight against Russia in Ukraine.

Willing to fight in Ukraine himself — though the Ukrainians didn’t want him or his dubious recruits — Routh wanted to be a man of action and was ready to kill for a cause.

If the cause of democracy in Ukraine was worth killing for, though, what about the safety of democracy right here in America?

Routh took both literally and seriously Democrats and progressives who say Trump is a threat to America’s institutions and the rule of law itself.

“DEMOCRACY is on the ballot and we cannot lose,” Routh wrote in a tweet to President Biden in April.

You can’t lose if your opponent is dead, and if democracy’s in danger, what conclusion does a desperate man of action draw?

Instead of moderating their rhetoric, Trump’s critics only doubled down after the first assassination attempt.

On July 19, Senator Heinrich, Democrat of New Mexico,  called Trump “an existential danger to our democracy.”

In last week’s presidential debate, Vice President Harris accused Trump of “attacking the foundations of our democracy.”

Democrats cut Trump no slack for telling his supporters to protest “peacefully and patriotically” on January 6, 2021, when some of them ran amok and invaded the Capitol.

Trump’s enemies don’t hold themselves to the same standard, though, when their own apocalyptic language incites a man like Routh to plan political murder.

Democrats have tried since 2016 to identify Trump with Russian dictator President Putin.

A man with a gun who wants to stop Mr. Putin might well think slaying Trump would save lives if, as Democrats and liberals in the media say, Trump is Mr. Putin’s catspaw.

No one thinks the man who assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914, Gavrilo Princip, was the cause of World War I by himself.

The political climate that led to Princip’s violent act could have and sooner or later would have inspired someone else to do the same thing.

The political climate today that inspired Routh encourages others like him.

The press has been recklessly uncritical of the incendiary characterizations of Trump that his opponents have trafficked in for years.

Listening to the Democrats or watching MSNBC, a terrified citizen might think the country is on the brink of dictatorship, and if ever there was a time for preemptive violence, it must be now.

Democrats who denounce political violence while leading their supporters to think freedom is finished if Trump wins aren’t just hypocritical — they’re culpable.

Progressives must find ways to argue against Trump without giving ammunition to the paranoid and impulsive.

Trump’s life is already in danger, but think about what happens if he wins.

On election night, what will people convinced Trump is a dictator do?

Right now is the moment to lower the temperature, which should have happened after the former president almost lost his life to an assassin at Butler, Pennsylvania.

Yet little changed after that horrific incident — Democrats apparently aren’t examining their consciences now, either.

The sister-in-law of the Democrats’ nominee for Virginia’s 7th Congressional District, Rachel Vindman, the wife of Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, a key figure in the first impeachment effort against Trump in 2019, tweeted after Routh’s attempted ambush of Trump, “No ears were harmed.”

An audience member, Corey Comperatore, was killed at Butler on July 13, and the GOP nominee came within an inch of death: Is this something Democrats like the Vindmans find funny?

Too few of the Republican’s most strident critics take seriously the implications of their own words.

They act as if Trump’s intemperance excuses greater intemperance on their part.

If Trump goes too far — and sometimes he does — Democrats have a duty not to go further still, but to pull back.

They haven’t, so Trump remains in would-be assassins’ sights.

Creators.com


The New York Sun

© 2024 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use