Big Win for Trump as Appeals Court Agrees To Hear Whether Fani Willis Should Be Disqualified for Secret Love Affair
The good news for the 45th president comes just a day after his Mar-a-Lago case was indefinitely delayed. Could Jack Smith, though, step into the breach?
The decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals to grant President Trumpâs request that it consider whether to disqualify the Fulton County district attorney, Fani Willis, from her sprawling racketeering case over her romance with her married prosecutor is a significant setback for the polarizing attorney.
By electing to hear arguments as to whether Ms. Willis should be disqualified, the appellate tribunal signals that her romantic relationship with the special prosecutor she hired, Nathan Wade, could be grounds for removal. Mr. Trump also contends that her extramural statements â say, accusing her critics of âplaying the race cardâ â amount to âforensic misconductâ and a second case for disqualification.
Mr. Trump will now have 10 days to file a formal ânotice of appealâ asking the state riders to overrule Judge Scott McAfeeâs finding that he and his co-defendants âfailed to meet their burdenâ to show that Ms. Willis, who is running for reelection, should be removed from the case. Judge McAfee, though, did find a âsignificant appearance of improprietyâ in the amorous affair between the prosecutors. The Fulton County code makes clear that an appearance of impropriety can be grounds for removal.
The trial judge â who himself is running for reelection â also detected an âodor of mendacityâ with respect to how Ms. Willis and Mr. Wade described their romance to the court. They allege that they only started dating after Ms. Willis hired Mr. Wade, who this week told âGood Morning Americaâ that workplace romances are âAmerican as apple pie.â The district attorneyâs office paid Mr. Wade more than $650,000 despite him never having prosecuted a felony case.
Judge McAfee did not find what he called an âactual conflict of interestâ in the arrangement between Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis, but the Court of Appeals could direct more scrutiny at, say, the trips the two took together to locales like Napa Valley, Aruba, and Belize while Mr. Wade was being paid by Ms. Willisâ office. The district attorney maintains she reimbursed her lover with cash she kept at home. Her father in court called that a âBlack thing.â
Mr. Trump and his co-defendants argue that Ms. Willisâ behavior has âcast a pall over these entire proceedingsâ and that Judge McAfeeâs decision to keep her on the trial is a âstructural error that would not just cause substantial error at trialâ but could be grounds for appeal if a verdict of âguiltyâ is brought in. Ms. Willis has struck a defiant note, insisting that âthe train is comingâ to convict Mr. Trump and the other 18 people she has charged.
The Sun corresponded with an attorney for one of Mr. Trumpâs co-defendants, the lawyer John Eastman. He writes âConsider this: Would we tolerate it if, in any important, unprecedented and difficult prosecution, the district attorney hired his or her spouse, or child, to handle the case? Would we have confidence in the sagacity of the judgments being made?â
The decision by the Court of Appeals, though, means that the train will be further delayed as Ms. Willis will once again be forced to defend her behavior. Judge McAfee decided that Mr. Wadeâs resignation cured the conflict, but that remedy could now be judged insufficient. Just yesterday, in another one of Mr. Trumpâs criminal cases, Judge Aileen Cannon indefinitely delayed the 45th presidentâs Mar-a-Lago trial.
If Ms. Willis is disqualified, a law passed in 2022 mandates that the executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneysâ Council of Georgia pick a replacement. That could take months, and push a trial far beyond Novemberâs presidential election. The executive director, Pete Skandalakis, tells NBC News that a district attorney âcannot refuse an appointment.â
In the event that the Georgia case is crippled by Ms. Willisâ disqualification, Special Counsel Jack Smith could consider whether to bring federal charges against some of her defendants who appear in his indictment as unindicted co-conspirators. These include the attorney Mr. Eastman, Mayor Giuliani and the lawyer Jeffrey Clark. Two more, the attorneys Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro, have already pleaded guilty at Fulton County. Mr. Eastman and Mr. Giuliani were also recently indicted in Arizona.
In a statement sent to the Sun, Mr. Trumpâs attorney, Steven Sadow, shared that his client âlooks forward to presenting interlocutory arguments to the Georgia Court of Appeals as to why the case should be dismissed and Fulton County DA Willis should be disqualified for her misconduct.â