Alvin Bragg Rebuffs Trump’s Efforts To Scuttle Hush-Money Case, Says Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Has ‘No Bearing’ on Conviction

Trump’s attorneys had argued that prosecutors used evidence that constituted ‘official acts’, thereby making the former president immune.

Getty Images
The Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg argues that the recent Supreme Court immunity ruling does not relate to President Trump's hush-money conviction. Getty Images

The Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, asked the judge presiding over President Trump’s hush-money case to deny the 45th president’s  request to toss out the guilty verdict and the indictment following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on presidential immunity. 

“This Court should reject defendant’s request to vacate his conviction and dismiss the indictment on the basis of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo and four of his colleagues wrote in their motion made public on Thursday. “Contrary to defendant’s arguments, that decision has no bearing on this prosecution and would not support vacatur of the jury’s unanimous verdict (let alone dismissal of the indictment) even if its reasoning did apply here.” 

Enter your email to read this article.

Get 2 free articles when you subscribe.

or
Have an account? This is also a sign-in form.
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Advertisement
The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use