The amendment that - Reader comments at The New York Sun

Recent Editorials

Reader comment on:
1970 and Now

Submitted by gregdn, Jan 15, 2007 09:37

cut off funding for S. Vietnam overrode a presidential veto, indicating bipartisan support. The bloodshed that followed as N. Vietnam took over the south would've been the same if the other side had won. We intervened on the wrong side of a civil war.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment	By	Date
As a citizen of a nation suffering the most from the disgusting Cold War, I really hate the power politics... [MORE]	Roatha Lain	Jan 17, 2007 01:43
In 1980, whilst doing research in Berkeley, California, I met my first neo-Con New Yorker who, by other cultural attributes,... [MORE]	Fred Willis	Jan 15, 2007 21:23
cut off funding for S. Vietnam overrode a presidential veto, indicating bipartisan support. The bloodshed that followed as N. Vietnam...	gregdn	Jan 15, 2007 09:37