Submitted by danielle, Sep 5, 2008 10:46

i think that the ones who were in prison for the crime, whether they did it or not, should not be banned from certain parts of the city except: schools,parks, daycares, etc. why cant people like the governor get things like that done to him just like everyone else? All because he is higher than the rest of us? I don't agree with this at all. now i think the ones that are on drugs, and the ones that have been a major threat should be on limitations, but i think the ones that have been released and staying out of trouble that aren't a threat, should be given a little more credit than that. because, how do we know that some of them were set up? its happened before and i know this for a fact. i know people that have ruined other peoples lives by crying wolf, and having that person put away in prison for something they didn't do just to get back at them. so really, you need to seriously sit down and analyze things before you jump the gun. and another thing, with this article, thats kinda like saying "if you put the vice president or president on a deserted island, do you really think he is going to stay there?" i think not, he will find some way off of it. so please, evaluate the information you have on people before you add more stipulations on them than they have now. thank you

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.