To JIM, who commented on Aug. 25. You are a condescending individual who is rather out of touch with what... [MORE]

lucia

Sep 18, 2008 14:29

Boy, talk about a stretch to make such a rabid feminist argument. Gotta make everything about feminism nowadays don't we,... [MORE]

Tracie

Sep 5, 2008 11:19

Who makes over $200,000 a year anyway? I don't want to punish anyone for their success but ...come on. [MORE]

Axl VanJovi

Sep 4, 2008 12:55

I think it's about time that the rich pay their share of taxes. They have had a free ride under... [MORE]

J Vandermeer

Sep 4, 2008 08:56

Any Federal Income Tax that is direct and not apportioned is illegal--period. The 16th amendment does not allow the government... [MORE]

isaiah

Sep 4, 2008 03:42

I agree the article may be stretching the case that the proposed taxes are against women. Why is everyone so... [MORE]

Sharon

Sep 3, 2008 18:46

I guess we have one of those households where we evil ones earn too much. If we have to give... [MORE]

Jim

Aug 25, 2008 16:14

RichardB What deluded planet are you on if you think the top wage earners aren't paying thier fair share. For... [MORE]

Chance Haywood

Aug 20, 2008 23:58

The title of the article is quite misleading. It is quite a stretch of imagination to come to the same... [MORE]

Anthony

Aug 17, 2008 23:44

Everytime the subject of taxes comes up people get all hysterical. Let it be remembered that taxes are what pays... [MORE]

RichardB

Aug 16, 2008 19:10

All tax policies are going to be unfair to someone. The republican attitude has been that if the rich have... [MORE]

John Doe

Aug 16, 2008 14:53

The subject of the article is misleading. "War on women"? More appropriately, we should all be asking what will be... [MORE]

Pamela

Aug 16, 2008 08:49

War on women? Vowing to overturn Roe v. Wade is a war on women. Suggesting that women who make less... [MORE]

TKK

Aug 16, 2008 00:20

I don't know a single person earning more the $100,000 but if I did earn that amount, which means a... [MORE]

RFO

Aug 15, 2008 20:45

What is the real size of the demographic we are talking about? I mean let's be serious, a household combined...

Nick Zamonis

Aug 15, 2008 14:46

First, if two people marry and incur higher taxes why is this a penalty only on the woman? Hopefully the... [MORE]

Tim

Aug 15, 2008 14:06

That assessment is a pretty extreme reach. There is no such thing as a second earner, man or woman. There... [MORE]

ff11

Aug 14, 2008 18:48

I dislike the attitude of the commenters here. Basically, you are saying that you don't care if a policy is... [MORE]

Steven

Aug 14, 2008 17:57

We are expecting our second child this winter. I make a good income enough to afford daycare for two children... [MORE]

lisa

Aug 14, 2008 17:47

It makes no difference whatsoever, whatever Obama claims he'll do on taxes before the election, will be out the window... [MORE]

Robert Arvanitis

Aug 14, 2008 17:21

So a couple making almost $400,000 a year will have to pay more taxes? Cry me a river. [MORE]

sefton

Aug 14, 2008 17:19

The hypothetical high wage earning couple can in most cases drastically reduce their exposure to federal and state income taxes... [MORE]

john Shirey

Aug 14, 2008 17:10