Submitted by par65, Dec 10, 2007 06:28

Ripping Mitchell's report seems a bitter pill to swallow now that the project is complete. Might have been more effective had you done this earlier.
1. What is the source of this criticism? The report? Moles in the investigation? What is it?
2. Why did you insert Rove/Bush politics into this? To balance the politics of your article, I would have preferred you use a hypothetical investigation by Janet Reno of the "I didn't have sex with that woman..." incident.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.