Submitted by T Vucurevich, Aug 15, 2007 03:23

Mr. Gitell's analysis is fatally flawed. Like most Editorial commentators he provides no factual basis upon which he builds his analysis. Rather he thinly veils his political ideology in a rambling expose that intermingles speculation on what actual role Rove may have had in his tenure at the White House with his completely inaccurate assessment of what President Bush said repeatedly about both the war in Iraq as well as the War on Terror, i.e. It would be a long and hard fight. The only people who didn't understand this are either: 1. Non English speaking, 2. Democrats, 3. Biased Journalists and Editors.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.