Now, this is an example of a good editorial by the NY Sun

Reader comment on:
Defending Justice Thomas

Submitted by Dorothy Wachsstock, Jun 7, 2007 09:07

This is more like your editorial high standards. Race and religion should have nothing to do with judgements on people's writings or qualifications for office. Discuss the difference in the issues.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment

Date

Thomas is more consistent in his judgments than any other justice. Scalia calls himself a "faint-hearted originalist" and sometimes votes... [MORE]

Allen Garvin

Jun 7, 2007 22:58

I have gained a lot more respect for Justice Thomas since I found out he is a friend of Rush... [MORE]

Ralph Woods

Jun 7, 2007 21:21

There is nothing more satisfying than to read a great article, Thank you for setting him straight. [MORE]

Celeste Farrar

Jun 7, 2007 18:07

No finer words have been said about this great man [MORE]

William hatten

Jun 7, 2007 16:03

This is a great article about Justice Thomas and his independence from the left wing think group. Thank God for... [MORE]

Judy Carlgren

Jun 7, 2007 15:46

This is more like your editorial high standards. Race and religion should have nothing to do with judgements on people's...

Dorothy Wachsstock

Jun 7, 2007 09:07

The New York Times seems to admire and understand "collectivism" in thought; which translates to "mindlessness". Justice Clarence Thomas is an... [MORE]

Nancy Joyce Jancourtz

Jun 7, 2007 08:09

Comment on Defending Justice Thomas