Submitted by Elizabeth Ellis, Feb 26, 2007 12:30

Supposedly the only reason Nader didn't win is that naysayers insist "he cannot win"...all the while admitting his track record and policies indeed are what is DESPERATELY NEEDED IN POLITICS AS WELL AS AT THE HELM IN THE OVAL OFFICE.

I watched the "An Unreasonable Man" and although I am glad they produced the movie and that it is out there, and as a woman, I find him unbelievably gorgeous, his straight on lifetime track may be "gigantic" already, as his biographer, Justin Martin, wrote, but, that GIGANTIC offering for President is supposed to be a WINNER. Landslide style winner!

Those who have not seen the movie, NOTE BENE that the friends and foes all insisted he cannot win, which is an absurdity. And, although that issue is entirely UP TO THE PUBLIC VOTERS - ESPECIALLY AT A MAJORITY LEVEL, his campaign staffers need to straighten up and say YES to NADER is BEST and WE KNOW THAT BETTER THAN ANYONE...or get off the campaign and Nader fans like myself who VOTED NADER both times, and will if he runs again, THIS TIME, the STAFF MUST SAY THE RIGHT STUFF. HE CAN WIN, HE SHOULD WIN, and HE WILL WIN.

Ralph Nader has priorities for the PRESIDENCY in ORDER! And, he respects the Constitution and what Democracy is all about.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.